It’s all about balls

Ball pond

I have a dream.  I have a dream that one day no article about women and their careers will need to mention their beauty regime or their wardrobe. Today I clicked on a feature about a well-known woman in the media industry hoping for some nuggets of her wisdom.  Indeed there were some, but I also came away knowing about her shoe preferences and skincare. Granted, in her particular field (fashion magazines) looking good is a sadly unavoidable factor. What bothers me is that in articles about women their appearance so often becomes part of defining their success.  It’s hardly furthering the cause.

It isn’t the details of a person’s personal life encroaching on their professional life that grates. Successful people are created by who they are and not just by what they achieve at work. It is interesting to learn that someone runs 20km to work or spends their spare time writing poetry. These things maketh the (wo)man. What becomes annoying is the unnecessary detail, the detail that doesn’t contribute to an understanding of why an individual has achieved what they have.

I read an article last year about easyJet chief executive Carolyn McCall – only the third female boss of a FTSE-100 company – that I wish I’d saved, so refreshing was its approach. It made me hopeful about the portrayal of women in the media. Not once did it mention her appearance. There was no talk of her home life. She was defined neither by her looks nor by whether she had kids. Other than the startling fact about how few women feature in the FTSE, she was written about neutrally – not as a man or a woman but as a business person. In fact, the treatment that men normally receive.

The piece about Carolyn McCall proved that it can be done – that a woman can be portrayed as simply being damned good at her job with not one ounce of that success being attributed to (or at least mentioned alongside) how she looks. We don’t need to know where she shops, whether she waxes or which member of One Direction she prefers. It may seem remarkable to some, but having balls isn’t just the preserve of men.

4 thoughts on “It’s all about balls

  1. Good point, well made.
    There must be – common sense dictates it but I can’t discern it precisely – a sort of inverse correlation between the normality of including the “personal” details of women’s lives and the underrepresentation of women in the highest roles. It isn’t that these details are missing fro profiles of men, but the presentation of them is usually to give a little colour to the man whose importance lies elsewhere, rather than to make them the essential characteristics of the person.

    And although you didn’t ask, I know that you wanted to learn that I have the complete works of Jasper Fforde on my bookshelf, and like to relax by browsing through my collection of socks.

  2. Totally ……It is easy to define yourself as whoever you show yourself to be, never once in 25 years in my profession have I related to my family or personal life, my career has always been just that…….the other side to the coin is that sometimes people will make a judgment call on who you ‘think’ you actually are……..and that can be very interesting and amusing….

Comments are closed.